Friday, October 25, 2024
HomePoliticsResisting a Deceptive, Anti-Union Agenda

Resisting a Deceptive, Anti-Union Agenda

Escalating attempts by billionaire-bankrolled local front groups to undermine Connecticut’s labor movement are falling flat and destined for failure. That’s the message AFT Connecticut President Jan Hochadel (right, in photo below) delivered in a recent letter to the editor of CT Examiner. She flunked a mouthpiece who in a previous published letter carried water for “shadowy, dark money-funded front groups with an agenda opposed to working peoples’ interests:”

 
As educators, we don’t take lightly assigning an ‘F’ to someone’s work. David Holman’s recent letter published in CT Examiner made that decision an easy call thanks to its many false and misleading claims and assertions. 
 
We would normally grade such a piece on a curve, considering the fact that the author is not an educator. His lack of firsthand experience as a member of a union made up of colleagues sharing the same employer and facing similar workplace challenges might also warrant a sliding scale.  
 
Perhaps that’s why his characterization of how collective bargaining agreements protect working people are so wildly off the mark. As a “salesman” one would expect him to know better than to try to fool readers into thinking it’s sustainable to reap benefits without investing the resources to maintain them.
 
Click here for the Economic Policy Institute’s research on the union benefit for all working people. 
 
Taking advantage of union-negotiated pay raises, healthcare coverage and a voice in workplace conditions without contributing a fair share of the cost means they’ll soon disappear. That’s essentially what began happening over fifty years ago in the private sector as membership density fell and dragged down all working peoples’ wages and benefits.
 
Click here for reporting in 2018 on the broader impact of the shrinking American labor movement.
 
That decline has largely spared public service, where employment opportunities with the “union difference” are still available in many states. We are proud that our labor organizations continue to help close both the gender and racial pay gaps and promise families a shot at the American Dream.
 
Click here for recent EPI research on the economic contributions of public sector unions. 
 
That fact leads us to conclude that the author is really just doing the bidding of shadowy, dark money-funded front groups with an agenda opposed to working peoples’ interests. He has been a vocal spokesperson for a local outfit tied to “Parents Defending Education,” a front group associated with the anti-public education Koch Network.
 
Click here to learn more about this extremist group and its billionaire-funders.
 
Such deceptive intent alone would demand an ‘F’ grade. For the author to contribute to the escalating “culture war” on our profession after teachers’ selfless work educating children in a global pandemic is shameful.
 
The good news is that union members are much smarter than the author and his extremist backers believe. Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision he lauded, our state federation’s certified educators membership has dropped less than one percent – much of it due to natural attrition.
 
Click here for a recent national op-ed on the negligible impact of the high court’s opinion.
 
Across the country, teachers are continuing to choose “Union YES” for a better future for themselves, their students and their school communities. They understand that together we can accomplish far more than any one of us are able to on our own – especially when it comes to educating future generations.
 
Click here for Hochadel’s original published letter in CT Examiner.
 
RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular